LIMITS

Project LIMITS 

‘Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities in European Cities: Life-courses and Quality of Life in a World of Limitations’ (Latcheva et al, 2006)

As regards social cohesion:

Aim

The integration of 6 groups of first generation immigrants from different sending countries into 6 cities in 5 European countries: Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden 

Findings

Housing is a key indicator for:

  • quality of life 
  • integration in the receiving country
  • social cohesion
  • urban tension

Housing quality depends a lot on the quality of housing provision in the receiving country.

The housing situation of immigrants has improved over time (Latcheva et al, 2006).

As regards migration, ethnic diversity and neighbourhoods:

(Latcheva et al, 2006)

Aim

Neighbourhood cohesion and social integration

Findings

FACTORS FAVOURING INTEGRATION FACTORS INHIBITING INTEGRATION(especially women and elderly)
  • KNOWLEDGE OF THE LANGUAGE OF THE RECEIVING COUNTRY
  • INVOLVEMENT IN MIGRANT ORGANISATIONS
  • LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE LANGUAGE OF THE RECEIVING COUNTRY
  • LACK OF INVOLVEMENT IN MIGRANT ORGANISATIONS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: