• What are you interested in?

  • En español

  • Learn key terms

    Find definitions for key terms used in this blog in our glossary
  • Do you want more?

    Debates and polls
    Join in current debates in Social Science and vote and check the results of polls about hot topics.

    Talk to the experts
    A space for exchange between the blog's readers and the Social Polis experts. Leave your questions and comments for the authors of the papers.

    Test your knowledge
    Online interactive quizzes to test your knowledge on Social Science.

  • Read the original Social Polis papers

    Social polarisation, the labour market and economic restructuring in Europe: an urban perspective
    Morlicchio and Pratschke

    Housing, Neighbourhood and Health: Research Review
    Cameron, Gilroy and Miciukiewick

    Cities, social cohesion and the environment
    Swyngedouw and Cook

    Towards a research agenda on Governance, Citizenship and Social Cohesion in Cities
    García, Pradel, Eizaguirre, Martínez and Terrones

    Super Diversity, Multiple Identities and Place
    Dukes and Musterd

    If you are interested in reading these papers, contact Social Polis.

  • References

  • Advertisements

Urban socio-ecological movements and the struggles for justice

A key theme in environmental justice is the work of environmental justice movements.

According to Agyeman (2005), EJM’s do not propose a progressive socio-ecological utopia. They are:

  • reactionary
  • defensive
  • demonstrating against injustices

Urban political ecology has paid less empirical attention to environmental justice movements and placed more emphasis on questions of intense social struggle (Swyngedouw and Heynen, 2003):

  • ‘How are socio-natural relations produced?’
  • ‘By whom?’
  • ‘For whom?’

From the ground up (Cole and Foster, 2001), EJM’s can improve the lives of disadvantaged communities:

  • better their consciousness of injustice
  • increase their self-confidence, capacity and expertise (p. 153)

However, EJM’s have only half succeeded in preventing environmental injustice (e.g. many TSDF’s are still built in disadvantaged communities).

It is surprising that environmental justice criticises social structures and injustices but not EJM’s! (Brulle and Pellow, 2005).


Scale and place have to be regarded as contested, in flux and relational (Massey, 2007; Swyngedouw and Heynen, 2003).

There is a growing interconnection between:

Click here to read all the topics on which further research about urban socio-ecological movements is needed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: